MANK Review — All Hollywood Loves It, But Others? Meh

Share this:

Lisa Johnson Mandell’s Mank review says it’s the kind of glamorous Hollywood biopic Oscar voters adore, but is a little too self absorbed for the rest of us.

Mank reviewBig names, lots of money, glamorous subject matter, how can you go wrong? The Netflix Oscar hopeful Mank didn’t exactly go wrong—there are some glorious moments within. It just didn’t go as right as it could have.

It’s the story of the birth of one of the greatest movies of all time, Orson Wells’ Citizen Kane, told from the perspective of its notorious, scathing witted screenwriter, Herman J. Mankiewicz, played with silver tongued elan by Gary Oldman (the go-to guy for period bios). But it’s also about 1930’s Hollywood, from Mank’s sardonic, alcohol soaked perspective.

Of course you can’t tell that story in beautiful black and white without including tres colorful characters like Orson Welles (Tom Burke), William Randolph Hearst (Charles Dance) and Marion Davies (Amanda Seyfried).

The film really comes alive when the focus is on the supporting characters. But Mank himself is too glib for his own good. He never utters a sentence without it being crucially quote worthy. You don’t really get the feeling that he was a real person, but rather a gin soaked repository for cunning quips. After awhile, his banter pummels rather than impresses.

Which is not to say that David Fincher’s directing is not superb, nor his father Jack Fincher’s script is not extraordinary (the senior Fincher wrote the script in the ’90’s, and passed away in 2003. His son David finally began work on the film in 2019). There are some marvelous segments — a dinner party at Hearst Castle, a stroll through the Hearst Zoo and a sun drenched picnic immediately to mind. They’ll take your breath away with their cinematic elegance.

But while there are many superlative LINES and extraordinary ACTING and PRODUCTION DESIGN that deserve all caps for their effect, the over two hour whole is not quite equal to the sum of its parts. It’s just too self-absorbed to truly absorb its audience.

Rated R

2 Hours 12 Minutes

If this Mank review convinces you that you should see it before the Oscars, catch it on Netflix.

Lisa Johnson Mandell’s Mank review says it’s the kind of glamorous Hollywood biopic Oscar voters adore, but is a little too self absorbed for the rest of us.

Share this:

Lisa Johnson Mandell

Lisa Johnson Mandell is an award winning journalist, author and film/TV critic. She can be heard regularly on Cumulus radio stations throughout the US, and seen on Rotten Tomatoes. She is the author of three bestselling books, and spends as much of her free time as possible with her husband Jim and her jolly therapy Labradoodle Frankie Feldman.

Leave a Comment





The Latest

I’LL BE RIGHT THERE Review — Edie Falco Battles the Middle Age Blues

CHASING CHASING AMY: A Devoted Fan’s Journey Through the Looking Glass

BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE Review: A Frisky, Frantic Return

IT ENDS WITH US Review — The Right Adaptation at the Right Time

DEADPOOL AND WOLVERINE Review — Piercingly Meta to the Max

Twisters Review — A Charismatic Thriller Storms the Cineplex

BEVERLY HILLS COP AXEL F Review, SPACE CADET Review — 2 Striking Streamers

DESPICABLE ME 4 Review — With Minions, What Could Go Wrong?

DADDIO Review / FANCY DANCE Review — 2 Interesting Indies

A QUIET PLACE DAY ONE Review — It Sneaks Up On You